I'm glad 300,000 people cared enough to sign the Uganda petition, but we are not their voters. Isn't this cultural imperialism?
Specifically, isn't it imperialist to suggest our voices should matter more than the voices of their voters in affirming laws, however wrong they may be?
Look:
• Rallying voters within Uganda to vote on Ugandan law? Democracy.
• Rallying voters in the US to vote on American aid/foreign policy provisions to Uganda? Democracy.
• Rallying people outside Uganda to sign a petition that Ugandan leaders have no obligation whatsoever to notice, and in fact would be ignoring their own voters by heeding? NOT Democracy.
Americans do not vote in Uganda. Britons do not vote in Uganda. Germans do not vote in Uganda. Only Ugandans vote in Uganda, and only they have the right to decide what their laws are. That is the basic idea of a democratic nation. By organizing a media campaign and swamping foreign politicians, we are interfering in the legitimate democratic processes of Uganda. Do we want them to be a democracy, or is it only good to be a democracy as long as people march in lock step with our cultural norms and our agenda? If we truly care about self-determination, if Democracy is so important to us that we are willing to bomb, torture, and invade on its behalf, we should get the hell out of their election and parliamentary process.
This isn't to say non-Ugandans can't do anything. As I pointed out above, foreign governments have their say through aid, trade, and various other means. And this certainly isn't to say that I approve of the decisions Ugandans are making. But our interference shouldn't come in the middle of the legislative step. That just gives the lie to all the noise we make about Democracy.

Recent Comments